Not sure who this ‘dude’ is but he obviously never served in the military – ALL service members not only have a duty to resist an UNLAWFUL or ILLEGAL order – no matter who issues it, but a responsibility to their fellow service members as well as that oath they swore upon enlistment/commissioning. That oath is very similar to the one that CONgress swear.
Who the f…hell is this smudge to make any new rule for me or anyone? How about a new rule for this self righteous idiot – he and his ilk are the people who MUST be the ones to enforce the confiscation. He’d best wear brown pants, if you know what I mean…
None of these politicians spouting for removal of guns would be the ones doing it and none of their bodyguards would be affected. Its only the poor and middle class that would be on the hunt and it would not be good for the nation. I know that saying from Heston many years ago rings true: “from my cold dead hands…”
I never served in the military due to a medical. Wanted to fly F14s off of a carrier. Thanks Top Gun. However, I do work for the federal gov’t, and I took an oath to defend the Constitution from enemies both foreign and DOMESTIC. And by God I plan on keeping that oath unlike our political “overlords”. They better get me day 1 as there won’t be a day 2.
I never served in the military due to a medical. Wanted to fly F14s off of a carrier. Thanks Top Gun. However, I do work for the federal gov’t, and I took an oath to defend the Constitution from enemies both foreign and DOMESTIC. And by God I plan on keeping that oath unlike our political “overlords”. They better get me day 1 as there won’t be a day 2.
I don’t get Nathan Rubin’s issue. He demands that firearm owners relinquish personal property they bought with their own money, that they support a “buyback” that uses tax dollars they provided, but gets his panties in a knot because gun owners demand pickup service?
Being “law abiding” by HIS definition, some decades ago:
I was a law abiding business man. Then the law said I had to give to the police the names and addresses of all the Jews in my employ. I followed the law. Then the law said I had to fire all those Jews. So I did, to remain law abiding. Then the law said all the Jews in town had to be relocated to the east, for their protection. I trust they are doing well.
10 thoughts on “Think Before You Tweet”
Not sure who this ‘dude’ is but he obviously never served in the military – ALL service members not only have a duty to resist an UNLAWFUL or ILLEGAL order – no matter who issues it, but a responsibility to their fellow service members as well as that oath they swore upon enlistment/commissioning. That oath is very similar to the one that CONgress swear.
Who the f…hell is this smudge to make any new rule for me or anyone? How about a new rule for this self righteous idiot – he and his ilk are the people who MUST be the ones to enforce the confiscation. He’d best wear brown pants, if you know what I mean…
None of these politicians spouting for removal of guns would be the ones doing it and none of their bodyguards would be affected. Its only the poor and middle class that would be on the hunt and it would not be good for the nation. I know that saying from Heston many years ago rings true: “from my cold dead hands…”
I never served in the military due to a medical. Wanted to fly F14s off of a carrier. Thanks Top Gun. However, I do work for the federal gov’t, and I took an oath to defend the Constitution from enemies both foreign and DOMESTIC. And by God I plan on keeping that oath unlike our political “overlords”. They better get me day 1 as there won’t be a day 2.
I never served in the military due to a medical. Wanted to fly F14s off of a carrier. Thanks Top Gun. However, I do work for the federal gov’t, and I took an oath to defend the Constitution from enemies both foreign and DOMESTIC. And by God I plan on keeping that oath unlike our political “overlords”. They better get me day 1 as there won’t be a day 2.
Twice is OK. And I totally agree with your last statement, except . . .won’t be day two for you, or they?
Dammit sorry for the double post. I would like to think that it was that good to read twice.
I don’t get Nathan Rubin’s issue. He demands that firearm owners relinquish personal property they bought with their own money, that they support a “buyback” that uses tax dollars they provided, but gets his panties in a knot because gun owners demand pickup service?
Talk about wanting it all your way! /s
Being “law abiding” by HIS definition, some decades ago:
I was a law abiding business man. Then the law said I had to give to the police the names and addresses of all the Jews in my employ. I followed the law. Then the law said I had to fire all those Jews. So I did, to remain law abiding. Then the law said all the Jews in town had to be relocated to the east, for their protection. I trust they are doing well.
slavery used to be the law of the land. does this mo-ron support slavery if it is the law.