“First”
The talking hairdo’s on cable and network news were all abuzz over the “first” woman to be named a major party Presidential nominee. Personally I could care less about the sex of a President and I knew a female President was inevitable at some point in America. What I do care about is the character of the person applying for the position. If this was a private sector job opening for CEO of America I would assume neither Trump nor Hillary would be hired, Obama would have been turned away for having zero experience at anything other than stirring up trouble around the water cooler.
You see character does mean something when profits are on the line, you can’t have a side job with your spouse doing shady deals with company clients and transferring profits to your personal checking account while at the same time putting the company books/bids/prices on a home server making it vulnerable for anyone interested in gaining access. You also can’t come into your interview for the position and insult the janitor and the IT guy on your way in, people don’t like that shit.
Since this a a government gig all rules are out the window. Hillary locked up the nomination with a system set up to “temper the rage of the masses”, meaning the party knows best the hell with what the voters think, it’s Hillary’s turn. This was decided years ago when Obama appointed her Secretary of State, he tossed her a bone with the understanding that she’s on deck when he’s out of office. Why do you think no one else ran against her other than a 70 something communist? I think the party bosses got together to decide which person they could run against her with zero chance of winning and voilà, say hello to Bernie. And to show how unpalatable a candidate Hillary is, old Bernie gave her a run….astonishing in oh so many ways but I digress.
Hillary, like Obama, would be an absolute train wreck as a President. It has nothing to do with her being female, it has everything to do with her being a vile individual. I know you can’t believe anything you read on the internet but if half of the things about this woman are true she should have been in prison years ago.
I don’t mind having a female President much like I could care less about a black President, but like Obama, there is nothing historic about being the “first” woman President if (A) the nomination was rigged and (B) it was rigged to nominate a corrupt, unethical, lying liar to be the “first”. You could be the “first” to snort cocaine and Fruit Loops but that doesn’t make it historic, just stupid. Obama was elected because he was a “first” and he has proven to be what we thought he was, Hillary will be the same.
There is nothing historic about Hillary becoming the “first” female nominee and potential POTUS, as a matter of fact, a generation from now history will prove that both “firsts” turned out to be the an undeniable disaster. Obama is well on his way to be named the “worst” President ever, if Hillary is elected, Obama may well drop back to the second.
Bring on the cocaine and Fruit Loops!
3 thoughts on ““First””
I’m speechless, Jeffi.
I can’t talk cause after reading this about the Queen of Rot my Taco with extra hot sauce lunch abandoned my stomach and wound up slamming into my tonsils just before searing my tongue!
The only thing that matters to progressives is to separate people into groups, then create a groupthink where the individual doesn’t matter. Hillary represents the group, not the individual. That’s one reason Dems are voting for her because of her genitals, even though she’s a liar and a fraud.
It is, unfortunately, more important to progressives to maintain the warfare between groups, rather than to promote the values of the individual.
One thing I think folks would do well to ponder:
The President, for all his ‘position’ is powerless without the consent of congress.
Start doing your research on the Senators and Representatives up for (re)election, and if it looks like Trump will lose out to Hillary, then ‘roadblock’ that bitch accordingly.