Supreme Court Justices Should At Least Try To Be Impartial
Something is wrong, very wrong with the Supreme Court. With the power they have to dictate law, (see Obamacare is a tax), the justices should at least try to put on a non partisan face. Unfortunately, they don’t even try anymore.
Justice Sonia Sotamayer speaking to students at Yale:
Sotomayor was asked at a talk at Yale Law School later in the day about her use of the term “undocumented immigrants” rather than the traditional illegal alien. Sotomayor characterized the issue as a regulatory problem and said labeling immigrants criminals seemed insulting to her.
“I think people then paint those individuals as something less than worthy human beings and it changes the conversation,” Sotomayor said.
Um, no. They are here illegally which makes them criminal. When a Supreme Court Justice twists that description you are in dangerous territory. She is looking through the wrong prism, instead of law, she is looking through the skewed perspective of left ideology.
The 59-year-old justice said she quickly left an interview to attend Harvard, feeling she didn’t belong. She said Yale students in the 1970s were talking about revolutions in Cuba and other countries while she had attended a Catholic high school where the monsignor supported the Vietnam War.
“This is too progressive for me,” she said of Yale, sparking laughter. “Yeah, strange, right?”
Shouldn’t be considered strange at this point. You either have convictions and principles or you don’t. If you change your mind with the prevailing winds, you are not worthy of being on the Supreme Court. And it seems to me, this is exactly what Ms. Sotamayer has become.
She admitted that she sometimes finds herself stuck between two worlds, one in which her colleagues talk of operas and another in which she sees a cockroach in an apartment in her old Bronx neighborhood and flees. “Sometimes I do feel I’m not part of either world completely,” she said. “My life has changed so much that going back I don’t feel I’m completely part of the conversation.”
I would like to think a Supreme Court Justice should be decisive, strong, and un-wavering, wishy washy don’t cut it. I would rather have a person who has worked their ass off for years with the hope to be considered for a Justice position, not one who feels out of place. That gives me the sense that she was surprised with the nomination, surprised she was confirmed, and feels obligated to the people who selected her. Basically a rubber stamp for the left.
4 thoughts on “Supreme Court Justices Should At Least Try To Be Impartial”
“undocumented immigrants”?
Sorry, but if you break the law you are a criminal. If someone breaks into my house they are a burglar, not an “uninvited guest.”
But what else can we expect from a self-described “wise Latina?”
“I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male…”
Tim – I think she owes to many people for her nomination than to actually come to her own conclusions on anything.
She’s gonna run with Hitlary as VP candidate and needs those 11 million votes from the wet-back crowd.
What a combo: President an alcoholic dyke and a V. President a vote mongering, ugly, bloated hypocrite.
America has come a long way in 237 years.
Toejam – I doubt she would give up the cushy justice position. Lifetime work, wonderful pay, and backdoor money for decisions that favor the left. Why get in the mud with Shillary.