What If?
Just spit balling here but like everybody else I’m trying to understand why all of these states have decided to go all in on full term abortion, well I have a theory.
Just like the coordinated talking points on CNNABCCBSMSNBC, liberals coordinate on everything so they can give the appearance that a majority of the country believe as they do.
What religion is the most adamant against abortion? I assume it’s Catholics although most Christian religions oppose it.
Dianne Feinstein admonished Amy Coney Barrett for her religious beliefs during her confirmation hearings in 2017.
The Democrat senator from California, Dianne Feinstein, attacked Barrett, a Catholic law professor at Notre Dame, with the accusation that she is essentially unfit for service as a federal judge because of her deeply held religious beliefs. “You are controversial,” Feinstein declared. “You have a long history of believing that your religious beliefs should prevail.” The Senator then added what has already become one of the most incendiary and widely repeated comments in recent memory: “When you read your speeches, the conclusion one draws is that the dogma lives loudly within you,” Feinstein said. “And that’s of concern when you come to big issues that large numbers of people have fought for years in this country.” here….
What if this is a preliminary strike against Amy Coney Barrett? Why you ask?
Imagine that Ruth Bader Ginsburgs health is worse than they are letting on and she is not long for this planet. Amy Coney Barrett is next in line for Trumps SCOTUS pick, there are only so many things that the liberal Senators can attack her on. They can’t have a fake rape allegation, she’s a female, her history has been vetted in previous confirmations, so what on earth can they go after her on?
Abortion
I believe this is all coordinated as an argument to hammer Amy Coney Barrett during confirmation hearings for the Supreme Court. If they can make it seem that Barretts Catholic faith will be a detriment to her serving as a Justice and if they can convince the Senate that her only goal is overturning Roe vs. Wade, they may be successful in keeping her off the court.
What good would that do you say, Trump will just send up another pick? The more time that passes the closer they get to 2020, stop her confirmation, Trump will be well into 2020 before another pick could be vetted, thus keeping Trump from another SCOTUS pick if he doesn’t get a second term.
I may be crazy, but it kinda makes sense.
10 thoughts on “What If?”
Oh, you’re not crazy. Preemptive strike on ACB is a big part of it. They want the abortion narrative well established before she ever goes before the Senate again. They also want to intimidate the RINOs like Romney and Collins to vote against her.
They also want to establish a precedence for states to follow New York’s lead. If the high court would ever act oh Roe V. Wade, abortion is going back to the States. They want it well established there.
My thoughts,
I agree that this is a preemptive maneuver. It is right out of their play book but it is also that they are horrible people. A woman’s right to choose is never in doubt because she chose to engage in reproductive activity, no matter what one thinks of sex these days. What’s being fought for is the woman’s right to eliminate the responsibility associated with that choice when it results in a child. In a sane world the abrogation of responsibility should not be considered especially when it deprives another human being of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, more so when that human being can’t speak for itself.
“There shall be no religious test for any elected or appointed federal office.” Oops! See Diane it’s right there in the Constitution.
Hmmm, let’s do a photo mash up of JFK and ACB as two Catholics who had to fight religious bigots to attain high office. The irony would be sweet to see.
Abortion has several significant aspects to the Left. The one that seems largest just now is its utility as a stick to beat conservatives with, that the “women’s vote” might remain firmly in the Democrats’ column. A Catholic conservative is, of course, a particularly juicy target. But there are other aspects to keep in mind, especially as the related subjects of physician-assisted suicide and socialized medicine are also getting increased attention.
Because nothing says culture of death like aiming to make post birth abortion acceptable.
If this doesn’t confirm to you that there are people so power hungry that they will push that narrative so they can gain even more power, then you ain’t paying attention.
You can bet your last donut that if they ever get the power they crave, the 25 million that Ayers said would probably have to be murdered because they would be totally unredeemable, will be on the low side.
Amazing how some groups will claim that Muslim politicians will not be slanted toward their religion but will claim Christianity will force their religions down our throats.
These same groups claim gun control will save children’s lives, yet applaud wildly when abortions right up to the infant’s birth is not only law but to be celebrated. How do they think children will be they are valued and cherished but can be thrown into a burn pile at their parent’s whim.
Look up ‘Diese Neues Volk’, the magazine the National Socialist’s Office of Racial Purity’.
It is not so much the worry of racial purity the National Socialist had in mind, it was more the want and desire of getting rid of the societal dregs, the unwanted, the undesirables amongst them.
The question will always be who gets to set the standard in what’s desirable and what’s not. Our current batch of socialist have already set the standard and they did it all without the snappy uniforms the National Socialist had. The death march they parade to is the very tune all Socialist have paraded to. Albeit their methods are different and more sophisticated in each successive generation the end result is always the same.
If your morals allow you to kill the most innocent and defenseless among us, what exactly does your morals stop you from doing?
Murdering six million inconvenient Jews?
Murdering six million inconvenient Cambodians?
If government can legislate and make it lawful to kill the most innocent life among us just because that innocent is inconvenient for them, what makes you think that you are protected from the same type of consequence?
MSG Grumpy
show how far down the slime pit America has fallen. A country founded on religious freedom and reverence for God now has a standard for murdering babies. liberalism is a mental illness. btw, the argument for abortion is the same argument for slavery. “you can’t tell a woman what to do with her body” is as valid as ” you can’t tell a slave owner what to do with his property”.