What’s The Happy Ending?
But the arithmetic is not difficult: Poland and Hungary and Slovakia do not have Islamic terrorism because they have very little Islam. France and Germany and Belgium admit more and more Islam, and thus more and more terrorism. Yet the subject of immigration has been all but entirely absent from the current UK election campaign. Thirty years ago, in the interests of stopping IRA terrorism, the British state was not above preventing the internal movement within its borders of unconvicted, uncharged, unarrested Republican sympathizers seeking to take a ferry from Belfast to Liverpool. Today it declares it can do nothing to prevent the movement of large numbers of the Muslim world from thousands of miles away to the heart of the United Kingdom. It’s just a fact of life – like being blown up when you go to a pop concert.
As I asked around Europe all last year: What’s the happy ending here? In a decade it will be worse, and in two decades worse still, and then in three decades people will barely recall how it used to be, when all that warmth and vibrancy of urban life that Owen Jones hymns in today’s Guardian is but a memory, and the music has died away, and Manchester is as dull and listless as today’s Alexandria. If Mrs May or Frau Merkel has a happier ending, I’d be interested to hear it. If not, it is necessary not to carry on, but to change, and soon – before it’s too late.
4 thoughts on “What’s The Happy Ending?”
I would be wanting to kill me some muslims and politicians
It is amazing to me how people, even in the USA are now starting to accept that muslim terrorism is a fact of life now.
imo, the western world is just going to roll over and accept that these attacks, their children being killed and raped by muslims will be part of life; what a bunch of women the western countries have become.
if I were the president of some western country, I would put the local muslim population on notice that for every 1 person the local muslims killed or raped, 10 of the local muslims closest to that incident would be killed and dumped in the ocean and anyone trying to shield them from harm would be arrested for obstruction of justice.
it used to be when a tribe came in and harmed people in your local community, you went out and killed them; how that is different from now; I don’t know. muslims certainly have no desire to leave their tribe and join and follow the local one.
I’ll start caring again the minute after the first serious counter-terror attack, but not before. Go tit-for-tat or raise the white flag; absent that, what’s the point?
Political correctness and appeasement help fuel this fire for the terrorist, elected officials are more afraid to make a stand for the nations people because they know Islam will revolt so they chose the lesser: terrorist attacks. What they fail to understand is these attacks will grow in number and in volume of destruction.
Might want to change the thinking: hit the Islamic communities hard, after all when was the last time a Muslim openly reported a terrorist attack about to happen to prevent it from happening? Just another sharia/Koran issued order as well as CAIR and such groups.
As for a nations citizens to protect themselves is not Islamic phobia and Muslim are not the victims here, they are the problem as sharia law requires ALL MUSLIMS to perform jihad and that is what people do not understand: jihad is not just the fighter or the bomber who kill himself, JIHAD IS ALL OF ISLAM, which means that no Muslim should ever be trusted on any level for you do not know who is protecting the fighter or bomber whomever they be.