Lawyers, Guns, and Money
Judge Kavanaugh’s testimony ended Friday, Sept. 7, and the Judiciary Committee vote was already scheduled for Thursday, Sept. 20, allowing another week for the full Senate to debate the nomination and vote, thus to have the new appointee confirmed by the time the Supreme Court convened on Oct. 1. Feinstein, who had been holding onto Professor Ford’s letter since late July, waited until Thursday, Sept. 13, to go public with it, pretending that this delay was about protecting the accuser’s anonymity. Of course, the Washington Post had been talking to Professor Ford for more than two months by then, and they had a feature story ready to go for the front page of their Sunday edition on Sept. 16.
What happened here was all a result of Feinstein’s bad faith (mala fides) in handling the accusation from Professor Ford. She had an obligation to inform her Republican colleagues of this accusation, and her failure to do so in a timely manner is inexcusable. We have been repeatedly told, by Democrats and their allies in the media, that Professor Ford’s accusation is “credible,” and yet it was not until Sept. 13 — nine days after Judge Kavnaugh had begun testifying to the Senate Judiciary Committee, and a week before the committee was scheduled to vote on his nomination — that Feinstein dropped this bombshell.
3 thoughts on “Lawyers, Guns, and Money”
This image looks JUST LIKE a schoolyard bully cornering a younger kid demanding their lunch money. Murkowski should have decked FineSwine……
That look of anger, intent and rage.
To be a fly on the wall when the fights between democrats in a closed room begins and they know their plan failed when they look at the FBI investigating Ford, Fienstein and others.
FBI “invesyigating” anything is a joke, especially a politician in Congress. Who owns who? We are talking Chicago rules for that game.