The Roy Moore Conundrum
If what I’m seeing is true, the allegations against Moore are false, but the GOPe and Democrats are pressing forward with demands he step aside. If his detractors are successful in getting him out of the race or senate if elected, and it comes to light that he was innocent…SUE!
Take legal action against McConnell, Gloria Allred, the accusers, and anyone else who was involved in the smear campaign.
If he’s guilty he can take the walk of shame but it sure is looking like the claims against him are lies.
She said that she never saw Moore after the alleged attempted sexual assault. But it turns out that wasn’t true. He was the judge in her divorce (in 1999). Would you allow someone who tried to rape you to be your judge in the divorce case? And he was never the D.A., so he wouldn’t have signed her yearbook with D.A. after his name. But when he was the judge, his assistant put his initials, D.A., after Moore’s stamped name to indicate he, the assistant, was doing the stamping. And she would have seen that on the divorce order and may have thought that was how Moore signed his name. And check the signature on the right in the CNN tweet above, it appears to be different color ink. That may be lighting, but it’s just showing on the ‘Moore’ and what’s under that, making it look like it could have been added later. Additionally, who writes 1977 twice in different handwriting? Here….
4 thoughts on “The Roy Moore Conundrum”
The GOP is not supporting and that is where they are making a huge mistake.The democrats no matter what stick like glue to each other and that is one reason they are so successful in staying alive.
This is a smear issue nothing more, to bring smear to a man some 38 years later without a bit of evidence and stating he’s guilty is like throwing stones without stones, at least he’s not a female Muslim.
And nothing anywhere about the Dem candidate arrested for stalking?
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2017/11/msm_ignoring_dem_candidate_for_congress_emarrestedem_for_stalking_a_woman.html
I am no expert, but even if I was unaware the signature is stamped, it does
not match the comment. The Capital M’s and the 7’s in the dates are off by
a mile. This appears to be evidence of three separate elements, not just two!
I still believe this is a smear. In my opinion, an amateur can tell they are not the same writing. In all my years, I have never seen anyone other than a classmate sign a yearbook. Yearbooks are for your classmates, not some person who is 12 years your senior to sign half way through the school year.