Browsed by
Tag: unions

Public Sector Pensions = City Killers

Public Sector Pensions = City Killers

I worked at a steel plant for eight terrifying months with union employees. I could work circles around most of them but because their badge number had an earlier hire date, I couldn’t move up by out working them. Most people assimilate to the union way….I quit.
The steel plant was a private company, it’s closed now and anything worth taking was sold to China and the plant demolished
, ironic huh.

Let’s look at public sector unions. They won’t close the government because China makes cheaper government, but the city/state can be dealt a blow by promises made by politicians on pensions. Democrats love unions because they do the same thing, get ahead using other peoples money.
Hard work used to be the mantra of America, now it’s who ya know, who ya blow, and quid pro quo. Sad.

When economists (those assholes again!) talk about public debt, they seldom mention the mountain of promises to government employees. If I promise you a job and regular raises for the next 30 years, that’s a debt I owe. It is no different than borrowing the money and handing it to you.

Problem is, it’s taxpayer money.

Furthermore, it’s no secret that state and municipal governments face few if any looming financial crises greater than pensions. Some governments have taken piecemeal steps to address this, largely copying moves made by the private sector. More specifically, defined contributions plans like 401ks are now recognized as far more sensible than the rich defined benefits schemes that were once the norm.

So it sounds great but in actual practice it fails miserably. Especially in a stagnant economy.

I can provide the answer here. They cannot be defused. They will explode when the cash runs out in the next decade. I’m not shedding any tears for the workers. They knew, or at least they should have known, that these lavish benefit packages were out of line. They live in the same world as the rest of us. They also know the money for those lavish pay and benefit plans comes out of their neighbors paycheck. To put it bluntly, they have been fucking the rest of us for decades so fuck’em.

Yep.

But the relationship between unions – whose power is increasingly concentrated in the public sector – and lawmakers means handsome deals have been struck between decidedly non-adversarial parties. Besides, it all involves other people’s money, and the unions have always provided handsome returns to friendly politicians’ campaign war chests. Taxpayers are now looking at the monstrous bill produced by such cozy extravagance.

It’s always the taxpayers getting screwed.

Louisiana, fortunately, doesn’t have as gigantic a burden as states like Connecticut face. That doesn’t mean it isn’t a huge problem in the Pelican State – to the tune of somewhere between $20 billion or nearly $75 billion, depending on which alarming report you consider more accurate.

Louisiana hasn’t adopted sensible reforms like raising the retirement age and moving to defined contribution plans. Louisiana taxpayers are still stuck with an antiquated and expensive arrangement where the defined benefit plan rules supreme.

In 2012 the Legislature did pass a law requiring future state hires to enroll in defined contribution plans, but led by the teachers’ unions and other interested parties – staffers, boards, lobbyists, investment salespeople, accountants, lawyers and the rest who ride like remoras on this bloated whale – the law was repealed.

What? Repealed? Shocker!

Of course. Letting public employees unionize was never about the state employees. It was about the democrat politicians hoovering off billions in tax dollars through the unions. The hacks running the unions funnel money to the politicians, who play ball. The union jacks also keep a nice share for themselves.

In other words, what Louisiana and practically every other state across this great land faces is a system that is — all together now — unsustainable.

There is no magic fountain. No one will do anything until it is too late. Detroit is the example states will follow. Over the next decade or so services will be reduced and budgets cut in areas like public recreation and road maintenance. Then the first waves of the crisis will hit state capitals. They will force haircuts on bond holders in an effort to contain the crisis. Eventually they will come back to pension plans and force haircuts on them. Some will simply default, passing a change to their constitutions to let them off the hook. The unions will sue, like they are in Illinois, but you can’t get blood from a stone.

What no one considers is those haircuts on bond holders will send ripples through the bond markets. A world built on passing debt around like whores at a biker bar cannot tolerate wholesale defaults. read entire article here

The Irony Is Mindblowing

The Irony Is Mindblowing

You just can’t make this shit up. SEIU staff has voted to go on strike. That’s right, apparently the union has another union backing it’s employees against the hated union boss. Worlds are colliding here, and the hypocrisy and irony can’t be understated.

The SEIU “Union” asked for concessions from SEIU Union staff, backed by the Communications Workers of America Union. So a Union is asking what a private owner would ask of it’s employees, but the SEIU is doing exactly what it would normally be striking against any other company. My goodness this shit is priceless, they are eating their own and they don’t even know it.

There’s nothing more embarrassing for union bosses than their own unionized staff striking against them or, in this case, threatening to strike.

In San Francisco, SEIU staff, represented by the left-wing Communications Workers of America, has been without a contract since their contract expired last September.

SEIU boss Roxanne Sanchez, according to the San Francisco Bay Guardian, is trying to get her union staff to give concessions on their pensions and health care.

Last week, after months without a contract, 94% of the SEIU’s own union staff voted to strike.

“We’re very much united in our position and our willingness to do what it takes to get a decent contract,” Peraino told us. Sayre told the Guardian, “There is widespread sentiment they’re being low-balled by management.”

A Nod to Weasel Zippers for the story, more here:

You Need Look No Further….

You Need Look No Further….

…for the reason government at all levels need to be separated from unions. If these people in New York can’t see the fleecing of the taxpayer in this one instance, then surely we have passed the tipping point.

How in the world can you justify $6,900.00 per student for bus transportation? Administrators, buses, fuel, and the drivers themselves most assuredly have a cost associated with them, but 1.1 billion per year? This is bus transportation for school kids! And this kind of thing happens at all levels of government when dealing with the unions.
I read somewhere last year that union custodians in New York make more than the teachers. I think the politicians need to be riding the short bus to economics 101.

New York City Schools Spend $6,900 Per Student – on Bus Transportation!

Government schools are an expensive endeavor, especially when union labor and no-bid contracts are involved.

The New York City Department of Education has been catching heat from transportation unions lately over a decision to solicit bids for private transportation services in an effort to curtail runaway costs.

The district has not sought “significant” bids for student transportation services in 33 years. That means it’s probably been using the same companies for years, without competitive bids to naturally control rising costs.

And those costs are increased every year because the companies use high-paid union drivers.

In response to the union criticism, the DOE recently issued a “School Bus Bids FAQ” which makes a staggering admission: the city spends $6,900 per student (for a total of $1.1 billion) per year for bus transportation.

In a 180 day school year, that’s $38.33 per student a day. At that rate it might be more cost-effective for the school system to distribute vouchers for kids to take taxis.

Continue reading…

Media Matters In Bed With Teachers Unions

Media Matters In Bed With Teachers Unions

I guess it should not shock me that this happens. I am wondering how they can spend their union’s dues, that are a mandatory payment by union employees, and paid for by taxpayers, intended forthe benefit of SCHOOL TEACHERS! Instead the funds are being funneled to special interests of the teachers unions.
How can anyone be so crass as to pay for political favors with monies that should go to help the teachers? This is why I really abhor unions. They are not helping the people they were originally designed to help. They are a political machine built to line the pockets of union bosses and the campaigns of democrats who are willing puppets happy to push the cause.
Once again the liberal media climb on board the union train and use their various print and tv venues to spin untruths about conservatives, and at the same time pimp the liberal logic of unions and how they can’t survive without democratic help.

FOX NEWS: A document the National Education Association filed with the U.S. Department of Labor in 2011 indicates that the teachers union donated $100,000 to Media Matters For America nearly two years ago, describing it as a payment for “public relations costs.” In the months that followed, Media Matters’ online coverage of teachers unions increased, focusing largely on attacking the Fox News Channel and other media outlets it considers “conservative” in nature.The $100,000 payment was first documented in “Shadowbosses: Government Unions Control America and Rob Taxpayers Blind,” a book by Citadel international politics professor Mallory Factor published on August 21. “[T]o ensure that NEA’s agenda makes its way in the media,” Factor wrote, “NEA has given $100,000 to Media Matters, the George Soros-funded liberal ‘charitable organization’ dedicated to targeting mythical right-wing media bias.” (RELATED – Book: Obamacare law designed to unionize 21 million health care workers) The Daily Caller has obtained an electronic document verifying Factor’s claim. It is available on a website operated by the Department of Labor’s Office of Labor-Management Standards.

And how about this tool in Washington State. A teacher who will not be fired but put on leave for ten days and moved to another school. My kids got a harsher punishment for staying out past their curfew.

Penatgon Cut’s Troops, Civilian Worker Numbers Grow

Penatgon Cut’s Troops, Civilian Worker Numbers Grow

I could be way off base here but I don’t understand Washington. You have veterans coming home after putting their lives on the line for this country. The “Hire a Veteran” ads are all over the place, which is great. But why not put these veterans to work at the Pentagon and get rid of the civil service workers. We are already going to be paying pensions and benefits to our veterans, which THEY DESERVE, so why not put them to work, thus saving the taxpayers from paying for a union government employee who can’t be fired.

If you don’t believe me, here are a few quotes and a pic of one our public servants after the quotes:

A senior flag officer at the Pentagon told The Washington Times that because of federal rules, “the problem with reducing civilians is you can’t fire anyone. The only way to do it is not to replace them.”

The Pentagon’s civilian workforce, which expanded dramatically during President Obama’s first three years, is not facing any significant reductions even as the Defense Department is slashing ground troops by more than 10 percent, retiring ships and combat planes, and putting off the purchases of some new weapons.

“While the fighting force is coming down, the overhead continues to grow,” he said. “It was an adverse ratio to start with, and it’s getting worse. You want to put your money in the tip of the spear, not in the rear with the gear.”