Browsed by
Tag: lies

Media Matters In Bed With Teachers Unions

Media Matters In Bed With Teachers Unions

I guess it should not shock me that this happens. I am wondering how they can spend their union’s dues, that are a mandatory payment by union employees, and paid for by taxpayers, intended forthe benefit of SCHOOL TEACHERS! Instead the funds are being funneled to special interests of the teachers unions.
How can anyone be so crass as to pay for political favors with monies that should go to help the teachers? This is why I really abhor unions. They are not helping the people they were originally designed to help. They are a political machine built to line the pockets of union bosses and the campaigns of democrats who are willing puppets happy to push the cause.
Once again the liberal media climb on board the union train and use their various print and tv venues to spin untruths about conservatives, and at the same time pimp the liberal logic of unions and how they can’t survive without democratic help.

FOX NEWS: A document the National Education Association filed with the U.S. Department of Labor in 2011 indicates that the teachers union donated $100,000 to Media Matters For America nearly two years ago, describing it as a payment for “public relations costs.” In the months that followed, Media Matters’ online coverage of teachers unions increased, focusing largely on attacking the Fox News Channel and other media outlets it considers “conservative” in nature.The $100,000 payment was first documented in “Shadowbosses: Government Unions Control America and Rob Taxpayers Blind,” a book by Citadel international politics professor Mallory Factor published on August 21. “[T]o ensure that NEA’s agenda makes its way in the media,” Factor wrote, “NEA has given $100,000 to Media Matters, the George Soros-funded liberal ‘charitable organization’ dedicated to targeting mythical right-wing media bias.” (RELATED – Book: Obamacare law designed to unionize 21 million health care workers) The Daily Caller has obtained an electronic document verifying Factor’s claim. It is available on a website operated by the Department of Labor’s Office of Labor-Management Standards.

And how about this tool in Washington State. A teacher who will not be fired but put on leave for ten days and moved to another school. My kids got a harsher punishment for staying out past their curfew.

The Ultimate Conflict Of Interest

The Ultimate Conflict Of Interest

The main players in the majority of information given via television, radio, and print media back Obama 10 to 1 in campaign contributions. So when does it become a conflict of American interest that the media gets to determine public opinion based on personal beliefs of their respective owner or CEO?  How do you stop an information source that bleeds blue? How can you stop the liberal views of people who have been inundated with socialist ideology from their earliest school memories through college? And these same people are hired by like-minded individuals to spread the bullshit on the airwaves and high-speed cable lines throughout the country.

It may be time that any company considered a MAJOR news source like say NBC/ABC/CBS/Fox can’t donate to political campaigns. If the owner/CEO decides they want to donate some of his or her own money…..knock yourselves out.

I think I would like a law that eliminates media companies from contributing to various campaigns. Even as jaded as I am about any new laws passed just for the sake of passing new legislation to justify their vaunted position, like politicians do, eliminating the media from the process would do us some good.

If you have a car give away or a radio contest for whatthefuckever, you are not eligible as an employee of said company. Do the same with the media. You can’t play. Seems like a legit resolution to me.

All the major media companies, driven largely by their Hollywood film and television businesses, have made larger contributions to President Obama than to his rival, former Gov. Mitt Romney, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, a nonprofit, nonpartisan Washington-based research group that publishes the Open Secrets Web site. The center’s numbers represent donations by a company’s PAC and any employees who listed that company as their employer.

Even companies whose news outlets are often perceived as having a conservative bias have given significantly more money to Mr. Obama. Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation, for example, has contributed $58,825 to Mr. Obama’s campaign, compared with $2,750 to Mr. Romney. The conglomerate, which owns Fox News, The Wall Street Journal, The New York Post and the 20th Century Fox studios, gave roughly the same amount to Mr. Romney’s Republican primary competitors Rick Perry and Ron Paul as it did to Mr. Romney.

Other media companies have contributed more significantly to Mr. Obama, including Time Warner, owner of CNN and the magazine publishing house Time Inc. The company, which is based in New York and also owns Warner Brothers and HBO, has contributed $191,834 to Mr. Obama in the 2012 election cycle, compared with $10,750 to Mr. Romney. The Walt Disney Company, owner of ABC and ESPN, donated $125,856 to Mr. Obama and $9,950 to Mr. Romney.

UPDATE:Chic-Fil-A Douchebag Hater Dresses Down Drive Thru Employee…And Is Promptly Fired

UPDATE:Chic-Fil-A Douchebag Hater Dresses Down Drive Thru Employee…And Is Promptly Fired

Apparently this guy stepped on the wrong toes. Common sense rules, congrats Vante for taking a stand.

Vante regrets the unfortunate events that transpired yesterday in Tucson between our former CFO/Treasurer Adam Smith and an employee at Chick-fil-A. Effective immediately, Mr. Smith is no longer an employee of our company.

The actions of Mr. Smith do not reflect our corporate values in any manner. Vante is an equal opportunity company with a diverse workforce, which holds diverse opinions. We respect the right of our employees and all Americans to hold and express their personal opinions, however, we also expect our company officers to behave in a manner commensurate with their position and in a respectful fashion that conveys these values of civility with others.

 

This guy is what the left looks like, thinks, and acts. From hoping for a “student sit in”  because “it just makes sense” to ripping an hourly employee who is probably happy just to have a job, this tool is the epitome of what progressives really are. You can’t reason with these people because they blindly jump on whatever movement the LSM dictates they follow. I am still amazed at the fist in the air head in the sand actions of these idiots. I feel sorry for the drive thru girl, she has to put on a smile and deal with this prick, even though you can tell she just want’s him outta there.

Watch the video far away from any liberals. You may have a sudden urge to slap the shit out of them.
http://youtu.be/thNqs9fPcgM

Simple Minds…

Simple Minds…

…have simple ways.

He is posturing for another stimulus. The simplistic explanation to his peeps is mind boggling. I may go buy some pizza from Brenda so she can hire a new employee, because that is how we grow our economy, pizza from Brenda. 
If this jack wagon gets re-elected it will further my point that the decay of the American Way is upon us.

Who The Hell Is In Charge Of These Agencies?

Who The Hell Is In Charge Of These Agencies?

Who do these government agencies think they are? How can they think that it is OK to take possession of a company vehicle and an employee of a small business without the permission of the business owner? Just who the hell do they think they are? I can’t fathom any reason whatsoever that would give a government agency a reason to pull a stunt like this. And what is sad, taxpayers will have to make this right.
Heads should roll on this. The people in charge need to start losing jobs, they have already been directly responsible for the death of the truck driver. Absolutely mind-blowing.
Fast & Furious make room for a new bunch of meddling fools. A Nod To Ace Of Spades for the story and link.

The phone rang before sunrise. It woke Craig Patty, owner of a tiny North Texas trucking company, to vexing news about Truck 793 – a big red semi supposedly getting repairs in Houston.

“Your driver was shot in your truck,” said the caller, a business colleague. “Your truck was loaded with marijuana. He was shot eight times while sitting in the cab. Do you know anything about your driver hauling marijuana?”

“What did you say?” Patty recalled asking. “Could you please repeat that?”

The truck, it turned out, had been everywhere but in the repair shop.

Commandeered by one of his drivers, who was secretly working with federal agents, the truck had been hauling marijuana from the border as part of an undercover operation. And without Patty’s knowledge, the Drug Enforcement Administration was paying his driver, Lawrence Chapa, to use the truck to bust traffickers.

At least 17 hours before that early morning phone call, Chapa was shot dead in front of more than a dozen law enforcement officers – all of them taken by surprise by hijackers trying to steal the red Kenworth T600 truck and its load of pot.

In the confusion of the attack in northwest Harris County, compounded by officers in the operation not all knowing each other, a Houston policeman shot and wounded a Harris County sheriff’s deputy.

Still waiting

But eight months later, Patty still can’t get recompense from the U.S. government’s decision to use his truck and employee without his permission.

His company, which hauls sand as part of hydraulic fracturing operations for oil and gas companies, was pushed to the brink of failure after the attack because the truck was knocked out of commission, he said. Patty had only one other truck in operation.
In documents shared with the Houston Chronicle, he is demanding that the DEA pay $133,532 in repairs and lost wages over the bullet-sprayed truck, and $1.3 million more for the damage to himself and his family, who fear retaliation by a drug cartel over the bungled narcotics sting.
“When you start a new business, there are obvious pitfalls you go through, a learning curve,” said Patty, who before buying his two trucks worked in the pharmaceutical industry. “But who would ever be ready to deal with this?

“How am I — a small businessman, father of three, American Joe from Texas — supposed to make a claim against a federal agency that has conveniently shrouded itself behind a red, white and blue cloak of confidentiality and secrecy?” Copies of letters and emails from Patty’s insurance company state that it won’t pay for repairs because the truck was part of a law-enforcement operation. Patty drew from his 401K retirement fund to repair the truck, which was out of operation for 100 days.

“I was not part of this,” he said. “I had absolutely no knowledge of any of it until after it happened. “For its part, the DEA has not admitted that it was using Chapa as a spy because its official policy is not to comment on whether someone was an informant. Lisa Johnson, a spokeswoman for the DEA Houston Division, confirmed that Patty’s demand had been received and noted that it would be investigated by the agency. But the Chronicle established Chapa was an informant based on interviews with multiple law-enforcement officials who spoke on the condition they not be named, and later by courtroom comments of prosecutors.

Patty’s request chronicles much of what he’s been through, including the operating costs for his trucks and everything repaired or replaced due to the attack. Among other disturbing chores was the need to hire a Spring-based company to clean up the mess in the cab caused by the killing.

Houston lawyer Mark Bennett, who is advising Patty, said if Patty’s initial claim is not resolved, the next step would be to sue.

1,000-mile detour

Patty hired Chapa five weeks before the shooting and now wonders how many of the trips in the $90,000 rig included DEA work. GPS information from the truck reveals an unauthorized trek to the Rio Grande Valley in the days before Chapa was killed. He took a 1,000-mile round trip detour from the route he was supposed to travel. Perhaps most unnerving, Patty says, is that drug mobsters now likely know his name, and certainly know his truck.

Past President’s Cabinet Appointments That Actually Worked In The Private Sector

Past President’s Cabinet Appointments That Actually Worked In The Private Sector

The percentage of each past president’s cabinet who had worked in the private business sector prior to their appointment to the cabinet. You know what the private business sector is — real-life business, not a government job.  A Nod To Woodsterman for letting me plagiarise his site.

Here are the percentages.

T. Roosevelt……………….. 38%

Taft………………………….. 40%

Wilson ……………………… 52%

Harding…………………….. 49%

Coolidge…………………… 48%

Hoover……………………… 42%

F. Roosevelt………………. 50%

Truman…………………….. 50%

Eisenhower……………….. 57%

Kennedy…………………… 30%

Johnson…………………… 47%

Nixon……………………….. 53%

Ford………………………… 42%

Carter………………………. 32%

Reagan…………………….. 56%

GH Bush…………………… 51%

Clinton …………………….. 39%

GW Bush………………….. 55%

Obama………………………. 8%

This helps explain the incompetence of this administration:only 8% of them have ever worked in private business! And these people are trying to tell our big corporations how to run their business?
How can the president of a major nation and society, the one with the most successful economic system in world history, stand and talk about business when he’s never worked for one?  Or about jobs when he has never really had one?  And when it’s the same for 92% of his senior staff and closest
advisers?  They’ve spent most of their time in academia, government and/or non-profit jobs or as “community organizers.”