Freedom Ain’t Free
Some were willing to risk their life for it.
The Liberal Struggle With Reality
It was considered laughable in ’79, now you get sued by the government for finding it odd.
The Strategy Of Power
Due to the interference of progressive design upon America’s first principles — her fundamental commitment to the protection of her citizens and their rights, to equality, liberty, and self-determination — liberalism has changed into a politicized authoritarian ideology. It has become, in effect, a strategy of power. Its scripture now demands a twofold sacrifice of intellectual honesty to ideological commitment and of individual conscience to a political shame culture — and so zealously have its votaries defended intellectual oppression and the misinformation that proceeds from propaganda, that it is now necessary to secure freedom from the liberal.
When leftists encourage hatred or intolerance towards others or distort the truth through their propaganda, when they stifle dissent and reward conformity of thought with the spirit of inclusion, they impair not only the maturity and character of the person, but they are also making a perverse form of social equality by denying whole populations the freedom to enjoy their right to know, their right to express, and their right to self-determination. If one wishes to believe what others have told him to believe, then he is not a free individual. This is the basis of new age political correctness.
here…
If You Can See The Tsunami, It’s Too Late
Important clip Via Western Rifle Shooters
48 Short Years Later……
Enoch Powell’s 20 April 1968 address to the General Meeting of the West Midlands Area Conservative Political Centre (commonly called “Rivers of Blood“)
was a speech criticising Commonwealth immigration and anti-discrimination legislation that had been proposed in the United Kingdom.
The speech caused a political storm, making Powell one of the most talked about, and divisive, politicians in the country, and leading to his controversial dismissal from the Shadow Cabinet by Conservative Party leader Edward Heath.
For reasons which they could not comprehend, and in pursuance of a decision by default, on which they were never consulted, they found themselves made strangers in their own country.
They found their wives unable to obtain hospital beds in childbirth, their children unable to obtain school places, their homes and neighbourhoods changed beyond recognition, their plans and prospects for the future defeated; at work they found that employers hesitated to apply to the immigrant worker the standards of discipline and competence required of the native-born worker; they began to hear, as time went by, more and more voices which told them that they were now the unwanted. They now learn that a one-way privilege is to be established by act of parliament; a law which cannot, and is not intended to, operate to protect them or redress their grievances is to be enacted to give the stranger, the disgruntled and the agent-provocateur the power to pillory them for their private actions.
Powell argued that he felt that although “many thousands” of immigrants wanted to integrate, he felt that the majority did not, and that some had vested interests in fostering racial and religious differences “with a view to the exercise of actual domination, first over fellow-immigrants and then over the rest of the population”.
Only resolute and urgent action will avert it even now. Whether there will be the public will to demand and obtain that action, I do not know. All I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal. keep reading at The ZBlog
48 short years later…..
Mr Khan was officially declared the first Muslim Mayor of London last night after comfortably defeating Tory rival Zac Goldsmith.
Signing in as the mayor of London, he was greeted with cheers as he said: “My name is Sadiq Khan and I’m the mayor of London.”
Heh….
Are You Not Entertained?
https://youtu.be/DCMZaBFcxrk
https://youtu.be/nDMvYCGTIKk
When You Lose Your Country
All hail multiculturalism.
This will not end well.
Mexifornia
Outside the government class, it’s a different story. Normal Americans are the ones paying the price for gesture politics. John McCain can be generous on immigration because he never experiences it. He lives in one of his wife’s 23 mansions, rides in government limousines and works in fortified government facilities. Men like John McCain live as strangers in this country. What they see of it is from a safe distance.
Similarly, the chattering skulls on television pull down six figure salaries and live in bunkered, whites-only communities. It is not an accident that they are crowded into the richest counties on earth, all of them around Washington DC. They are the petty royalty of the ruling class. To these people, normal Americans are aliens, indistinguishable from the people sneaking over the border. here….
PJ CampbellLa Raza sympathizers attacked #Trump rally-goers in #CA. Some time, somewhere, this isn’t going to end well for them
So That’s How That Works
To suggest that those who have goods and services to sell have some sinister interest in keeping their potential customers too poor to buy is sheer nonsense! If the president of General Motors wants to sell you a Cadillac or a Buick or a Chevrolet—which he does—then he wants you to be rich enough to buy. In the free economy, everyone has a stake in the economic well-being of every other person.
It is in the immediate interest of business and businessmen that the masses of people be well off; people who are poor are poor customers, and business cannot survive without customers. Business has no stake in poverty; but there is a class of people who do need the poor, who do have an interest in keeping them poor. Permit me, in a slight digression, to offer you a few words on this point by the celebrated economist Thomas Sowell: “To be blunt, the poor are a gold mine. By the time they are studied, advised, experimented with and administered, the poor have helped many a middle class liberal to achieve affluence with government money. The total amount of money the government spends on its ‘anti-poverty’ efforts is three times what would be required to lift every man, woman, and child in America above the poverty line by simply sending money to the poor.”— Edmund A. Opitz, “Ethics and Business”
