Browsed by
Category: Politics

Canadian Liberal

Canadian Liberal

Just got this in an email, thought I would share.

A Canadian female liberal wrote a lot of letters to the Canadian government, complaining about the treatment of captive insurgents (terrorists) being held in Afghanistan National Correctional System facilities. She demanded a response to her letter. She received back the following reply:

 National Defense Headquarters
M Gen George R. Pearkes Bldg., 15 NT
101 Colonel By Drive
Ottawa , ON K1A 0K2
Canada

Dear Concerned Citizen,

Thank you for your recent letter expressing your profound concern of treatment of the Taliban and Al Qaeda terrorists captured by Canadian Forces, who were subsequently transferred to the Afghanistan Government and are currently being held by Afghan officials in Afghanistan National Correctional System facilities.

Our administration takes these matters seriously and your opinions were heard loud and clear here in Ottawa You will be pleased to learn, thanks to the concerns of citizens like yourself, we are creating a new department here at the Department of National Defense, to be called ‘Liberals Accept Responsibility for Killers’ program, or L.A.R.K. for short.

 In accordance with the guidelines of this new program, we have decided, on a trial basis, to divert several terrorists and place them in homes of concerned citizens such as yourself, around the country, under those citizens personal care. Your personal detainee has been selected and is scheduled for transportation under heavily armed guard to your residence in Toronto next Monday.

 Ali Mohammed Ahmed bin Mahmud is your detainee, and is to be cared for pursuant to the standards you personally demanded in your letter of complaint. You will be pleased to know that we will conduct weekly inspections to ensure that your standards of care for Ahmed are commensurate with your recommendations.

 Although Ahmed is a sociopath and extremely violent, we hope that your sensitivity to what you described as his ‘attitudinal problem’ will help him overcome those character flaws. Perhaps you are correct in describing these problems as mere cultural differences. We understand that you plan to offer counselling and home schooling, however, we strongly recommend that you hire some assistant caretakers.

 Please advise any Jewish friends, neighbours or relatives about your house guest, as he might get agitated or even violent, but we are sure you can reason with him. He is also expert at making a wide variety of explosive devices from common household products, so you may wish to keep those items locked up, unless in your opinion, this might offend him. Your adopted terrorist is extremely proficient in hand-to-hand combat and can extinguish human life with such simple items as a pencil or nail clippers. We advise that you do not ask him to demonstrate these skills either in your home or wherever you choose to take him while helping him adjust to life in our country.

 Ahmed will not wish to interact with you or your daughters except sexually, since he views females as a form of property, thereby having no rights, including refusal of his sexual demands. This is a particularly sensitive subject for him.

You also should know that he has shown violent tendencies around women who fail to comply with the dress code that he will recommend as more appropriate attire. I’m sure you will come to enjoy the anonymity offered by the burka over time. Just remember that it is all part of ‘respecting his culture and religious beliefs’ as described in your letter.

You take good care of Ahmed and remember that we will try to have a counsellor available to help you over any difficulties you encounter while Ahmed is adjusting to Canadian culture.

Thanks again for your concern. We truly appreciate it when folks like you keep us informed of the proper way to do our job and care for our fellow man. Good luck and God bless you.

 Cordially,
Gordon O’Connor
Minister of National Defense

Change The Damn Rules

Change The Damn Rules

Health insurance companies are being regulated state to state, they are compelled by definitions of the Constitution and these rulings date back decades. I think it is time to take a closer look at some of these rulings as it pertains to insurance, because they favor the insurance companies and not the American people. If Congress is our mouth piece, I believe I want Obamacare repealed and insurance companies be forced/allowed to do business across state lines. Go get ’em mouth pieces.

Below is a law review I found interesting, worth the read. If you want to read the entire thing – go here.

Steven G. Calabresi, The Right to Buy Health Insurance Across State Lines: Crony Capitalism and the Supreme Court

The health insurance industry is just as much an industry as are General Motors and Ford. Just as the Commerce Clause allows Congress to regulate automobile emissions on cars that are bought and sold, the Commerce Clause also allows Congress to regulate the buying and selling of health insurance.

The holding of Paul v. Virginia that corporations are not citizens under Article IV, Section 2 is a catastrophe from a policy perspective because it allows in-state corporations to use state law to protect themselves from out-of-state competition subject however to the constraints of the Dormant Commerce Clause. In areas like insurance, where Congress has somehow purported to “override” the Dormant Commerce Clause by statute, the costs are immense. It is quite simply absurd to say that corporations have free speech rights and the right to sue in federal court but no right to compete on an even playing field in interstate commerce.

VI. CONCLUSION

When Congress delegates its Commerce Clause power to the States—a power that is almost certainly exclusive in some respects—it violates the text of the Constitution just as surely as it would if it delegated its power to declare war to the states. There are fifty states today, not thirteen as at the founding, and as a result there are countless more external effects of state legislation on other states as well as many more state line crossings. The fifty states simply cannot be trusted to regulate a huge national service industry on which we spend one-sixth of our GDP as a nation if the states have carte blanche to discriminate in licensing against out-of-state health insurers.

By upholding the healthcare mandate, the Supreme Court has ruled that all of us MUST now buy the services of the fifty state health insurance cartels, oligopolies, and monopolies. It is incumbent on the Supreme Court to make sure that American consumers are not turned into the victims of crony capitalism by a weird confluence of its bizarre Dormant Commerce Clause and Privileges and Immunities Clause doctrines. NFIB v. Sebelius obligates the Supreme Court to take a second look in the healthcare context at decisions like Prudential Insurance Co. v. Benjamin; Western & Southern Life Insurance Co. v. California; and even Paul v. Virginia.240 In A Common Law for the Age of Statutes, Judge Guido Calabresi argued for second look judicial review when a set of statutes passed at very different times in our history and coupled with old case law produce a result we doubt Congress would legislate today. It is time for the Supreme Court to put an end to Crony Capitalism in the health insurance industry.

 

The Full Power Of The Federal Government

The Full Power Of The Federal Government

Amazing to think that the Obama regime has used so many different tactics to secure his second term and got away with it. It would be one thing if it was just a rogue IRS agent picking on conservative non-profits, but it appears that numerous tactics were used to brighten the halo over Obamas head when in fact, it was all fake.

Just a few items that we know about to date:

1. IRS stalling conservative non-profits not because of rogue agents, but an orchestrated effort by the White House to stop them.
2. The constant “Keep Your Plan” lie to help bolster the belief that Obama was handing America free/cheap health insurance.
3. The DOJ stomping out any voter ID laws allowing rampant voter fraud.
4. Census Workers being directed to make up unemployment numbers to reflect dropping unemployment rates just before the election.
5. Obama executive order installing parts of the Dream Act to garner the Hispanic vote prior to the election.
6. Obama flopping on his Gay Marriage stance to garner the LGTB votes.
7. Obama regime illegally tracking AP journalists communications in an effort to intimidate the media.
8. Obama campaign purposely disabled the credit card verification system for its Web site donations, allowing anyone from any foreign country to donate with no limit and no proof of identity.
9. In the GM bailout, he illegally shortchanged investors who according to bankruptcy laws were first in line to be recompensed; instead, he gave their share to the unions to garner votes.
10. Twisted the arms of defense contractors to not issue layoff notices in early November, so as to avoid causing bad news for Obama right before the election — even though federal law (the “WARN Act”) requires such notices.
11. Benghazi cover up.

The list could go on but my point is, taken one at a time you wouldn’t see an advantage, take them all together and you can see what Obama does. Just like Valerie Jarret was famously quoted as saying before the 2012 election, “you are either with us or you are against us”, you can see the Obama regime has NO problem using the full force of the federal government to lie, cheat, threaten, and intimidate to achieve whatever goals or agendas they want. And anybody willing to go that far begs the question, what won’t they do?

Campaigner-In-Chief

Campaigner-In-Chief

With the Affordable Care Act completely fixed by a few statements in a press conference by our President, he has deemed it OK to head off on the campaign trail again. Seems legit, apparently by just breathing the words everything is good to go, and he can go back to what he knows, bumpin’ uglies with the blue blood and blathering about how great he and his party is. No pesky reporters asking mean spirited questions, just a bunch of like minded rich people happy to listen to the great orator speak and toss some cash at him. Thank you President Obama…all is well.

Problem is, all is not well. Over five million people have lost their healthcare, insurers aren’t sure what the hell to do, and even worse, what do these people do who have lost their plan in the interim? I have not heard of a bridge policy to cover people who were cancelled who can’t get coverage from the ACA.

Shouldn’t the President be in a room with a bunch of really, really, really smart people pounding out some kind of a solution?
Obviously not, that is what makes Obamas press conference on “the fix” a complete and total sham. The legal issues facing his “fix” are complex, just cause ya say it, don’t mean it works. And he knows that, this is another fraud to cover his democratic jock swingers. He was forced to come out and say something, even when he knows that the insures can’t do what he just told them to do. This is a whitewash on a Pinto praying it doesn’t rain.

 

Where is the leadership? Whilst he is out and about doing his thing, who has the task of backing up his speech? Bueller…Bueller…..oh I see, nobody. He is hoping for a website fix, then he can tell people who have lost the plan to go get Obamacare because it works now and you will love it. The big stall.

 

I wonder what a businessman would do? What would somebody who has been in the trenches, knowing that if his plan does not work, people could lose everything, potentially their lives. What would somebody who has had a payroll to meet, hundreds of thousands of jobs determined by decisions made by him….what would a real leader do? Guess we will never know.

 

There Never Was An “If” In Obamas Promise

There Never Was An “If” In Obamas Promise

As all of the fallout and panic hits the Democratic Party, the Obama boot lickers still cling to the fallacy that Obama kept his promise, and it is always prefaced with an “if” the health care plan you had met the new laws regulation.

Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) said it’s “absolutely a fact” that people who like their insurance plans can keep them, as President Obama promised – if that plan “met the standards” set by Obamacare, that is. CNSNews.com said to Boxer on Thursday: “After President Obama signed the ACA he said that if you like your health care plan you will keep it. No one can take that away from you.”

“I think everyone knows he said that,” Boxer said. She spoke shortly before Obama announced that he would let insurance companies renew policies for existing customers in the individual market through 2014, even if those policies don’t meet the law’s requirements.

But is it true or false?” CNSNews.com asked.

“Oh, it’s absolutely a fact that if you had a plan that you wanted to keep, that met the standards, you could keep it,” Boxer said “If it was a junk plan and didn’t meet the standards, you couldn’t, but he’s about to fix it now.”

This is another lie! How in the world can these people continue claiming it’s a fact that Obama kept this promise? He lied to get the bill passed, anything after the fact, the website, the failed roll out, the shady regulations that force cancellations is irrelevant at this point. It certainly doesn’t hurt that the entire roll out has been an absolute disaster but it hides the very basic fact that this President committed fraud against the American people, the very people who pay for his wonderful new world.

Nixon lied about knowledge of the Watergate burglaries, he was caught on his own “Smoking Gun” secret tapes, the Supreme Court ordered the tapes released and eventually Nixon resigned to avoid impeachment.
Obama lied for five years, campaigned on a lie, passed an unpopular law on a lie, the regulations confirming his lie are written in the Federal Register for all to see. He knew, his people knew, his parties politicians knew, yet he gets a pass. Two journalist and one whisltleblower took Nixon down, that is all it will take for the Obama house of cards to fall, and we already have the “Smoking Gun” in the Federal Register. All we need are some journalist with some balls.