My advice to Trump in a previous post was, if you are going to pick a fight with a Fox News moderator and threaten a boycott, then just do it. It makes no sense drawing a line in the sand if you continue to cross it.
So he’s not doing the debate, good for him. I didn’t think he would do it. I guess if you keep throwing Twitter bombs at Megyn Kelley, eventually you will have to back up the tough talk.
Now follow me on this. He picked a fight, Fox News punched back. If he shows up at the debate after the fact he looks bad. If he doesn’t show up he will be called a whiny little bitch not being able to face Ms. Kelley. It was a lose-lose scenario for him after he started the fight.
That begs the question, why? Why open up a healed wound? The first debate dust up was buried, Roger Ailes and Trump kissed and made up, all was well in the kingdom.
I think he bailed because he genuinely didn’t want to do the debate, didn’t want to face Cruz and the boys, and this was a good excuse. Why give Cruz another shot at him? Trump has a passionate following. He knows his backers would vote for him even if he showed up in a grass skirt and coconut bra, but some could turn if he has a major debate melt down or stumble. Why chance it?
So he doesn’t have to face Cruz, Jeb, or Rubio again, he doesn’t hurt himself in the last national debate when everybody on the stage will be taking shots at the front runner. He blows off spending the week in Iowa where poll numbers show he could lose, debate or not. He blasts through New Hampshire with a huge win and momentum heading south with the Iowa drama tossed in the dust bin of history, much like Santorum’s Iowa win back in 2012.
He took this lose-lose scenario, and in his mind, turned it into victory. And if the debate ratings tank, he successfully poked a stick in the eye of Megyn and Fox News.
So there you have it, in my humble opinion, Trump comes out of this unscathed……..but I’m a Cruz guy, so what do I know.