Browsed by
Tag: Homeland Security

Priorities

Priorities

Border-wall opponent Representative Nancy Pelosi decried the deaths of two illegal-immigrant children on the same day Singh was murdered, bashed the government shutdown, and, on New Year’s Eve, promoted her upcoming MSNBC special.

But not a peep was heard from Pelosi about Singh, the suspected illegal-immigrant murderer, or the arrests of a total of seven alleged accomplices — all reported to be illegally in this country as well.

Border-wall opponent Senator Kamala Harris tweeted three times between Christmas and New Year’s Eve bemoaning the plight of illegal immigrants and their children.

But not a peep was heard from Harris about the brutal shooting death of Newman, Calif., police corporal Ronil Singh at the hands of a Mexican gang member illegally in the country and protected by the very sanctuary policies Harris champions.

Border-wall opponent Senator Dianne Feinstein released a public letter to the Customs and Border Patrol agency on the day of Singh’s murder to voice her “strong concern about the recent deaths and illnesses of children detained in Border Patrol custody, and to request a full accounting and a revised protocol to prevent such tragedies from occurring in the future.”

But not a peep was heard from Feinstein about Singh, no call for investigation of how the suspected murderer and his alleged accomplices arrived in the U.S., how they were able to evade arrest and detection, and who employed them and aided, abetted, and sheltered them.

Power Regardless of Cost

Power Regardless of Cost

No wall, because they gotta replace you uppity American voters with new ones who are willing to submit.

No wall, no matter how many American citizens have to die.

Every day that they refuse to allow the man we elected president to fulfill the most basic function of a national government – securing its national borders – they make a deliberate choice to accept more dead Americans. Oh, and more crime, poverty and welfare costs too. They are willing to let it all happen because their power means much, much more to them than your prosperity, your security, or your life.     keep reading…..

Enemies Foreign & Domestic

Enemies Foreign & Domestic

The use of language is key to influencing public policy and the Socialist Democrats are experts at using it to conjure up images that play to our emotions.  By falsely portraying invaders as immigrants, they are attempting to connect and tie our past history of immigration to today’s unlawful invasion by those who believe invading our home is their right and not a privilege.  Mexico’s newly elected President Andres Manuel Lopez-Obrador recently stated his government will assist migrants who seek to enter the United States as it is a “human right we will defend”.

The desire to erase our borders will spell the end of U.S. sovereignty, a mission the left and its anti-American allies could not achieve politically or militarily.  As a powerful superpower, the defeat of the United States was not likely; thus, the left’s only hope was to destroy us from within.  The importation of millions of legal and illegal foreign nationals whose allegiance and customs they refuse to surrender at the border continues to permanently alter the face, language, and culture of America.  

America is our collective home and we have a right to protect our home from foreign and domestic threats.  It is not for lack of compassion we seek an end to the invasion.  It is an act of self-preservation.  Please remember that at the ballot box when it is time to cast your vote.    Keep reading….

Build the fucking wall!!!!

Playing The Game

Playing The Game

This is a lie.

More specifically, it’s several lies.

1. Trump Created Separation Of Children From Illegal Immigrant Parents. This is plainly false. In 1997, the federal government made an agreement in a case called Flores not to keep unaccompanied illegal immigrant children in custody beyond 20 days. The settlement said nothing about accompanied illegal immigrant children – children who crossed the border with their parents. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals then ruled that accompanied children also could not be held in custody under the terms of the settlement. This meant that the government either had to release whole families, or that the government had to separate parents from children.   here….

True Colors

True Colors

Now, with President Obama’s unconstitutional DACA being eliminated, we see yet another example of masks falling. Many republicans will oppose the unlawful Obama DACA program being removed.  This reality only amplifies the signs the Big Ugly confrontation is needed more than ever.  It’s President Trump against a unified DC system.

And the masks come off.

Ryan had said during a radio interview on Friday that he didn’t think the president should terminate DACA, and that Congress should act on the issue.

 

“My hope is that as part of this process we can work on a way to deal with this issue and solve it through legislation, which is the right way to do it and the constitutional way to do it,” Rubio told CNN in June.

 

Utah Sen. Orrin Hatch joined Ryan in cautioning Trump against rolling back the program.

There is one political enterprise within Washington DC and national politics. There is only one enterprise. That enterprise is the UniParty. There is only one political party in Washington DC, with two internal caucuses – Republicans and Democrats.   Keep reading…

 

As for Rubios claim that legislation is the “right way and constitutional way” to fix the issue, where was the legislation when Obama used his executive order to implement the program in the first place? Oh, that’s right, the conservative base doesn’t want amnesty so they lied and opposed DACA with a wink and a nod to Obama to go ahead with his liberal agenda.
There is no other explanation for their current position.

Your Argument Is Invalid

Your Argument Is Invalid

“There’s only one problem with this hostage crisis theory of immigration. It’s insane.

If they’ll go off and join ISIS if we don’t let them in, what happens when we do let them in?

Why would we want to take in people who express their disagreement with our politics by shooting up a gay nightclub or a social service center that helps the developmentally disabled?

When normal people don’t like a policy, they protest or write a letter to the editor. They don’t plant a pressure cooker bomb next to a little boy or stab college students with a butcher knife.

“Let us in or we’ll kill you” is the least compelling immigration argument ever.”              here…