A Nod To The Gods

 

 

 

And take all of your liberal, progressive, LTBG, atheist, intellectual elite ass kissers with you. Oh, and the MSM, but I repeat myself.

Unfreakin believable. Obama can’t punch his way out of a paper bag, blusters about an unpopular attack, and his cluster fuck of appointed head of state, (one of many), stumbles into a way to save face for the king.

Now the libs are praising him for his strength and savvy foreign policy in staring down Russia and gettin tough with Syria. What a bunch of jock swinging morons.

I am happy we are not getting involved in Syria but I would have much rather Obama admit that the American people have spoken and don’t want him to act, instead of gleaning some false praise that he is the genius behind a political solution.

The Obama Administration’s explanation of how a Russian proposal to get rid of Syrian chemical weapons came to be has morphed rapidly in the past 24 hours from being portrayed as an unexpected slip-up to — in its new incarnation — a plan that U.S. officials were involved in as early as last week.

“I had some conversations about this with my counterpart from Russia last week,” Secretary of State John Kerry said during a House Armed Services Committee hearing on Tuesday, referring to Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov. “President Putin raised the issue with President Obama at St. Petersburg. President Obama directed us to try to continue to talk and see if it is possible. So it is not something that — you know, suddenly emerged, though it did publicly. But it cannot be allowed to be a delay.”

“This suggestion today by [the Russians] about bring the chemical weapons Assad has under control, I think it’s a direct result of the president saying he’s ready to do whatever is necessary to back up what he’s already said,” Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-Md.) said.

 

Krauthammer said it best: ”The Russians were playing chess here with a set of rank amateurs.”

 

It’s long but worth the watch. If you wondered whether we should or should not attack Syria, this would answer all your questions. Found it HERE
http://youtu.be/2spBMUP5Yq8

“When London was getting bombed, it was profoundly unpopular both in Congress and around the country to help the British,” he said. “It doesn’t mean it wasn’t the right thing to do. Just means people, you know, are struggling with jobs and bills to pay and they don’t want their sons or daughters put in harm’s way.”

Barack Obama during a speech where he tried to say that, while bombing Syria is unpopular, it is the right thing to do.

Except, as usual, he has no idea what he’s talking about.

A Gallup poll in 1940, when the German bombing campaign in Britain took place, showed 60 percent of Americans felt it was more important to help England win,even at risk of going to war, than to stay out.

Additionally, 68 percent of Americans believed the future safety of the United States depended on England winning the war, and 85 percent felt England would lose if Americans stopped sending war materials to help.

In March 1941, Congress passed the Lend-Lease Act, which empowered the president to lend, lease or exchange war materials with countries whose entanglements were considered crucial to national security.

You would think his speech writers would do some research. This guy is an idiot.

Di Fi says she know best.
OK Senator, please explain, in detail.

What don’t we know? We have seen videos of dead women and children apparently killed by chemical weapons. We have seen the black flag of Al-Qaeda flying over the rebel troops. We have seen Christians being attacked by the “freedom fighters”.

The rebels said it was Assads troops who used the gas, the Syrian refugees say that the rebels were the ones using the chemical weapons.

So what is it that you have privileged information about? Tell us, maybe it would sway Americans opinion of not wanting to get involved in the conflict.

With global communications being what they are, I think we know what you know, what more could there be?

And by the way lady, don’t you find it a bit hypocritical to arm anybody, when you have fought so hard and spoken so passionately to take Americans guns?

 

What a sad state of affairs.

10 REASONS NOT TO BOMB SYRIA, THE DUMBED DOWN VERSION

Yeah, lets get involved in Syria, whats the worst that could happen? Just like everything Obama touches, it goes to hell.

As world attention focused on the coup in Egypt and the poison gas attack in Syria over the past two months, Libya has plunged unnoticed into its worst political and economic crisis since the defeat of Gaddafi two years ago. Government authority is disintegrating in all parts of the country putting in doubt claims by American, British and French politicians that Nato’s military action in Libya in 2011 was an outstanding example of a successful foreign military intervention which should be repeated in Syria.

Libyans are increasingly at the mercy of militias which act outside the law. Popular protests against militiamen have been met with gunfire; 31 demonstrators were shot dead and many others wounded as they protested outside the barracks of “the Libyan Shield Brigade” in the eastern capital Benghazi in June.

Read more:

There is a bunch of serious shit going on right now and the biggest blowhard pushing for Syrian intervention is playing games on his phone during congressional hearings? What the fucking fuck?

The fix is in kids, this is puppet theater, Obama is going in no matter what.

I am not for or against….yet. I don’t have the facts nor do I have the luxury of defense reports, but this is a huge issue facing the nation, and McCain is playing games? This isn’t a time share salesman, you are about to put lives in jeopardy, and this is the focus you give it?

Pathetic!!